Farm Subsidy information
Sheridan County, North Dakota
Total Subsidies in Sheridan County, North Dakota, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 2,014
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Sheridan County, North Dakota totaled $262,867,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Miller Family Farm | Denhoff, ND 58430 | $2,881,847 |
2 | Faul Farms | Martin, ND 58758 | $2,281,193 |
3 | Steichen Farms Jv | Goodrich, ND 58444 | $1,761,272 |
4 | Frueh Farms | Goodrich, ND 58444 | $1,758,236 |
5 | Troy Henry Stein | Mcclusky, ND 58463 | $1,656,459 |
6 | Sheldon Leonard Oster | Drake, ND 58736 | $1,655,207 |
7 | Douglas Mark Erdmann | Mcclusky, ND 58463 | $1,642,678 |
8 | Lee Edward Boehm | Mcclusky, ND 58463 | $1,634,090 |
9 | Dennis D Weltz | Anamoose, ND 58710 | $1,619,916 |
10 | Michael Richter | Goodrich, ND 58444 | $1,585,137 |
11 | Myron Henry Dieterle | Kief, ND 58723 | $1,536,952 |
12 | Steichen Farms | Goodrich, ND 58444 | $1,523,954 |
13 | Steven Russell Hausauer | Kief, ND 58723 | $1,511,490 |
14 | M & B Faul Farms | Denhoff, ND 58430 | $1,443,851 |
15 | Dean A Ripplinger | Mcclusky, ND 58463 | $1,427,958 |
16 | Steven Kent Erdmann | Denhoff, ND 58430 | $1,401,409 |
17 | Craig Allen Peerboom | Goodrich, ND 58444 | $1,374,908 |
18 | Larry Lee Kaibel | Drake, ND 58736 | $1,335,001 |
19 | Mark Cecil Demke | Goodrich, ND 58444 | $1,256,384 |
20 | Faul Jerome/agnes Jv | Mcclusky, ND 58463 | $1,252,278 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>