Total Commodity Programs in Sheridan County, North Dakota, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 391
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Sheridan County, North Dakota totaled $7,741,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Faul Farms | Martin, ND 58758 | $354,492 |
2 | Frueh Farms | Goodrich, ND 58444 | $297,437 |
3 | Miller Family Farm | Denhoff, ND 58430 | $192,468 |
4 | M & B Faul Farms | Denhoff, ND 58430 | $186,458 |
5 | Chadwick Scott Rauser | Goodrich, ND 58444 | $145,947 |
6 | Farm Services Agency ** | Washington, DC 20250 | $126,109 |
7 | Paul Norman Kaibel | Drake, ND 58736 | $124,131 |
8 | Douglas Mark Erdmann | Mcclusky, ND 58463 | $120,915 |
9 | Steven Kent Erdmann | Denhoff, ND 58430 | $120,193 |
10 | Michael Richter | Goodrich, ND 58444 | $119,071 |
11 | Steichen Farms | Goodrich, ND 58444 | $112,397 |
12 | Lee Edward Boehm | Mcclusky, ND 58463 | $111,049 |
13 | Farm Credit Services Of Nd ** | Dickinson, ND 58601 | $109,476 |
14 | Steven Russell Hausauer | Kief, ND 58723 | $98,956 |
15 | Sheldon Leonard Oster | Drake, ND 58736 | $95,779 |
16 | Troy Henry Stein | Mcclusky, ND 58463 | $95,641 |
17 | Christopher H Stein | Mcclusky, ND 58463 | $95,641 |
18 | Mark Cecil Demke | Goodrich, ND 58444 | $94,098 |
19 | James Mark Pellman | Mcclusky, ND 58463 | $89,125 |
20 | Reimche Land And Cattle Inc | Martin, ND 58758 | $88,920 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>