Market Facilitation Program (MFP) in Slope County, North Dakota, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 137
Recipients of Market Facilitation Program (MFP) from farms in Slope County, North Dakota totaled $3,049,000 in in 2019.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Facilitation Program (MFP) 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dakota West Farms | New England, ND 58647 | $119,765 |
| 2 | David, Devon And Faye Burke Partnership | Bowman, ND 58623 | $104,581 |
| 3 | Teresa Nielsen | New England, ND 58647 | $103,002 |
| 4 | Stuart Nielsen | New England, ND 58647 | $103,002 |
| 5 | Shannon Craig Stafford | Dickinson, ND 58601 | $101,638 |
| 6 | James Alan Erickson | New England, ND 58647 | $86,206 |
| 7 | Scott Olson | New England, ND 58647 | $84,068 |
| 8 | Stuart Earl Dilse | Scranton, ND 58653 | $83,419 |
| 9 | Kathryn Volk Dilse | Scranton, ND 58653 | $83,419 |
| 10 | Daryle Dennis | Amidon, ND 58620 | $77,026 |
| 11 | Brooks Chalky Butte Ranch | Bowman, ND 58623 | $72,776 |
| 12 | Wanda Powell | Bowman, ND 58623 | $70,921 |
| 13 | James R Powell | Bowman, ND 58623 | $70,921 |
| 14 | Dan Thomas Powell | Bowman, ND 58623 | $64,670 |
| 15 | Susan Elizabeth Powell | Bowman, ND 58623 | $64,670 |
| 16 | Susann Powell | Amidon, ND 58620 | $58,042 |
| 17 | Jeff Powell | Amidon, ND 58620 | $58,040 |
| 18 | Dean Allan Wandler | New England, ND 58647 | $53,113 |
| 19 | Leslie Ann Wandler | New England, ND 58647 | $53,113 |
| 20 | Kenneth Urlacher | New England, ND 58647 | $52,695 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf