Conservation Reserve Program in Auglaize County, Ohio, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 561
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Auglaize County, Ohio totaled $1,437,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Derroll Miller Revocable Trust | Wapakoneta, OH 45895 | $4,718 |
82 | Jeffery A Mcdaniel | Wapakoneta, OH 45895 | $4,502 |
83 | Barnes Gross Farms Inc | Waynesfield, OH 45896 | $4,480 |
84 | Keith Leffel | New Knoxville, OH 45871 | $4,480 |
85 | Kyle D Frische | Wapakoneta, OH 45895 | $4,448 |
86 | John N Bergman Revocable Trust | Celina, OH 45822 | $4,374 |
87 | Bruce R Stoner | Saint Marys, OH 45885 | $4,283 |
88 | Allen E Huckemeyer | Saint Marys, OH 45885 | $4,226 |
89 | Brb Farm Project 321 LLC | Wapakoneta, OH 45895 | $4,182 |
90 | Jay Henschen | Saint Marys, OH 45885 | $4,096 |
91 | Don R Mann | Galena, OH 43021 | $4,042 |
92 | Scott Fry | Waynesfield, OH 45896 | $4,018 |
93 | Nevelyn F Line | Waynesfield, OH 45896 | $4,000 |
94 | Jason J Vanderhorst | Wapakoneta, OH 45895 | $3,984 |
95 | Jean R Roos Revocable Trust | Scotia, NY 12302 | $3,970 |
96 | Ed Davis | Wapakoneta, OH 45895 | $3,919 |
97 | Sycamore Spring Farm LLC | Wapakoneta, OH 45895 | $3,886 |
98 | Jeffrey Zwiebel | Wapakoneta, OH 45895 | $3,856 |
99 | Glenn Ramga | Wapakoneta, OH 45895 | $3,836 |
100 | C Ray Sidey | Wapakoneta, OH 45895 | $3,836 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”