Conservation Reserve Program in Auglaize County, Ohio, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 552
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Auglaize County, Ohio totaled $1,222,000 in in 2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Wild Gobbler Farms LLC | Saint Henry, OH 45883 | $33,334 |
| 2 | Charles Sutherland | Waynesfield, OH 45896 | $30,654 |
| 3 | M&m Baer Farms LLC | Spencerville, OH 45887 | $26,774 |
| 4 | Phyllis A Ramga Revocable Trust | Saint Marys, OH 45885 | $22,036 |
| 5 | Timothy G Becher | New Knoxville, OH 45871 | $20,455 |
| 6 | Jerome Glorioso | Lima, OH 45806 | $19,209 |
| 7 | Gary Schrolucke | New Knoxville, OH 45871 | $18,788 |
| 8 | Jack Schrolucke | New Knoxville, OH 45871 | $18,788 |
| 9 | Kurt E Zwiebel And Julia L Zwiebel Joint Revocable | Saint Marys, OH 45885 | $18,221 |
| 10 | Hugh A Core Revocable Trust | Wapakoneta, OH 45895 | $17,629 |
| 11 | Yahl Keystone Inheritance Irrevocable Trust | Saint Marys, OH 45885 | $17,205 |
| 12 | Berlet Revocable Trust | Wapakoneta, OH 45895 | $16,515 |
| 13 | Wayne R Bambauer Revocable Trust | New Knoxville, OH 45871 | $16,221 |
| 14 | Larry Dardio | Wapakoneta, OH 45895 | $14,399 |
| 15 | Patrick R Severt | Saint Marys, OH 45885 | $14,248 |
| 16 | Prueter Family Farms, LLC | New Knoxville, OH 45871 | $13,865 |
| 17 | John M Hines | Wapakoneta, OH 45895 | $13,411 |
| 18 | Heritage Land Holdings LLC | Saint Marys, OH 45885 | $11,815 |
| 19 | Franklin D Place | Wapakoneta, OH 45895 | $11,286 |
| 20 | Kathryn Reichelderfer Irrevocable Trust | Columbus, OH 43219 | $11,149 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf