Dairy Programs in Auglaize County, Ohio, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 39
Recipients of Dairy Programs from farms in Auglaize County, Ohio totaled $1,548,000 in in 2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Dairy Programs 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | K & K Dairy Inc | Botkins, OH 45306 | $120,508 |
| 2 | Howard Homan Farms Inc | Saint Marys, OH 45885 | $108,097 |
| 3 | Jeremy W Elsass, Quietcove Farm Holstein | Wapakoneta, OH 45895 | $97,232 |
| 4 | Kevin E Fisher | Botkins, OH 45306 | $91,436 |
| 5 | Bornhorst Dairy Inc | Fort Loramie, OH 45845 | $81,976 |
| 6 | David Harold Homan | New Bremen, OH 45869 | $77,637 |
| 7 | Settlage & Settlage Partnership | Saint Marys, OH 45885 | $70,987 |
| 8 | Alan Brown | New Bremen, OH 45869 | $58,942 |
| 9 | Michael P Smith | New Knoxville, OH 45871 | $56,474 |
| 10 | Lane Hill Farm LLC | Minster, OH 45865 | $55,809 |
| 11 | Dan W Koenig | New Bremen, OH 45869 | $55,322 |
| 12 | Koeper Farms LLC | New Bremen, OH 45869 | $54,809 |
| 13 | Dahlinghaus Farms LLC | Minster, OH 45865 | $53,382 |
| 14 | Louis Brown | New Bremen, OH 45869 | $53,047 |
| 15 | Jay Elshoff, Golden Hills Farm | Saint Marys, OH 45885 | $48,869 |
| 16 | Richard L Steinke Mapl-valle Farms | Wapakoneta, OH 45895 | $48,854 |
| 17 | Donald J Klein, Klein Dairy | New Bremen, OH 45869 | $45,256 |
| 18 | A & M Farm, Inc. | Minster, OH 45865 | $43,319 |
| 19 | Alan Rinehart | Wapakoneta, OH 45895 | $41,578 |
| 20 | Melvin Fledderjohann | Saint Marys, OH 45885 | $31,495 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf