Market Loss Assistance Program in Auglaize County, Ohio, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,363
Recipients of Market Loss Assistance Program from farms in Auglaize County, Ohio totaled $10,555,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Loss Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Manchester Farms | Lakeview, OH 43331 | $137,200 |
2 | Liette & Sons Dairy | Saint Marys, OH 45885 | $125,566 |
3 | Rivercrest Farm Inc | Harrod, OH 45850 | $112,372 |
4 | Thomas Fetter Revocable Trust | Waynesfield, OH 45896 | $95,820 |
5 | Bambauer Equipment LLC | New Knoxville, OH 45871 | $84,437 |
6 | Quietcove Farms | Wapakoneta, OH 45895 | $82,369 |
7 | Greg Shobe | Waynesfield, OH 45896 | $77,040 |
8 | Warren E Bailey | Wapakoneta, OH 45895 | $76,255 |
9 | Thomas L Doorley | Wapakoneta, OH 45895 | $71,961 |
10 | Tadd A Turner | Harrod, OH 45850 | $69,089 |
11 | Heintz Farms Partnership | Belle Center, OH 43310 | $66,825 |
12 | Highlawn Farms Flp | Harrod, OH 45850 | $65,412 |
13 | Kohler Acres Inc | Wapakoneta, OH 45895 | $64,856 |
14 | Jeffrey Lee Hager | Wapakoneta, OH 45895 | $62,831 |
15 | Bert A Daley | Lakeview, OH 43331 | $59,614 |
16 | James A Steinemann | Fort Loramie, OH 45845 | $57,538 |
17 | Jay Seibert | Spencerville, OH 45887 | $56,904 |
18 | Schroeder Brothers | Wapakoneta, OH 45895 | $55,191 |
19 | Ritchie Brothers | Wapakoneta, OH 45895 | $54,672 |
20 | Lane Hill Farm Limited Ptr | Minster, OH 45865 | $54,327 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>