Farm Subsidy information
Clark County, Ohio
Total Subsidies in Clark County, Ohio, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 231
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Clark County, Ohio totaled $6,169,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Constance A Bishop | New Carlisle, OH 45344 | $12,240 |
22 | , | $12,026 | |
23 | Allen Armstrong | South Charleston, OH 45368 | $11,977 |
24 | Taylor S Renner | Springfield, OH 45502 | $11,793 |
25 | Kaffenbarger Farms Inc | New Carlisle, OH 45344 | $11,331 |
26 | , | $10,564 | |
27 | David L Allen | Springfield, OH 45502 | $10,368 |
28 | Larry R Wolbert | Mechanicsburg, OH 43044 | $10,117 |
29 | Waymire Family Farms LLC | Yellow Springs, OH 45387 | $9,356 |
30 | Kelley Kimley | South Charleston, OH 45368 | $8,970 |
31 | Kevin D Spears | South Charleston, OH 45368 | $8,806 |
32 | Ray Steele | New Carlisle, OH 45344 | $7,948 |
33 | Larry Edmond Mullins | South Vienna, OH 45369 | $7,328 |
34 | Nancy Fisher | Springfield, OH 45502 | $7,019 |
35 | Bart F Neer | South Vienna, OH 45369 | $5,771 |
36 | Scott Pendleton | Springfield, OH 45504 | $5,675 |
37 | Thomas E Cline | South Charleston, OH 45368 | $5,488 |
38 | George A Degenhart | Springfield, OH 45502 | $5,479 |
39 | The Myers Family Revocable Living Trust - Carla E | South Charleston, OH 45368 | $5,326 |
40 | Robert A Agle | South Vienna, OH 45369 | $5,256 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”