Total Commodity Programs in Clark County, Ohio, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 395
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Clark County, Ohio totaled $3,191,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Van Raay Dairy Farms Partnership | South Charleston, OH 45368 | $436,935 |
2 | Thompson Grain Farm | Jamestown, OH 45335 | $96,991 |
3 | Harbage Farms | South Charleston, OH 45368 | $85,873 |
4 | Bumme Farms LLC | South Vienna, OH 45369 | $68,725 |
5 | Kaffenbarger Farms Inc | New Carlisle, OH 45344 | $64,325 |
6 | Lynn- Alan Farms | New Carlisle, OH 45344 | $61,992 |
7 | Neer Farms | South Vienna, OH 45369 | $57,085 |
8 | Flax Farms LLC | South Charleston, OH 45368 | $47,548 |
9 | Adam Agle & Sons LLC | South Vienna, OH 45369 | $46,939 |
10 | Thornhill Ltd Partnership | Springfield, OH 45502 | $42,548 |
11 | Agri Business Finance ** | St Paris, OH 43072 | $42,517 |
12 | Kelley Kimley | South Charleston, OH 45368 | $42,293 |
13 | Kevin D Spears | South Charleston, OH 45368 | $42,121 |
14 | Allen Armstrong | South Charleston, OH 45368 | $39,689 |
15 | Beckenridge Farm | Springfield, OH 45502 | $38,012 |
16 | Harbage Bros Farming Co LLC | South Charleston, OH 45368 | $37,236 |
17 | Wildman Farms | Cedarville, OH 45314 | $34,160 |
18 | Robert Keehner Jr | London, OH 43140 | $33,041 |
19 | Kenneth Lokai | New Carlisle, OH 45344 | $32,809 |
20 | Robert Andrew Bumgardner | South Vienna, OH 45369 | $32,667 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>