Farm Subsidy information
Clark County, Ohio
Total Subsidies in Clark County, Ohio, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 236
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Clark County, Ohio totaled $6,991,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Ray Steele | New Carlisle, OH 45344 | $7,046 |
42 | Adam E Steele | New Carlisle, OH 45344 | $7,043 |
43 | Nancy Fisher | Springfield, OH 45502 | $7,019 |
44 | Titus LLC | Springfield, OH 45502 | $6,466 |
45 | D Michael Bumgardner | South Vienna, OH 45369 | $6,322 |
46 | Robert Mcclure Jr | Springfield, OH 45502 | $6,308 |
47 | Joshua Seth Toops | South Vienna, OH 45369 | $6,104 |
48 | James Keplinger | Springfield, OH 45504 | $5,910 |
49 | Larry Timmons Jr | South Charleston, OH 45368 | $5,782 |
50 | Bart F Neer | South Vienna, OH 45369 | $5,771 |
51 | John T Baird & David J Baird Ptr Dba Jersey Manor | Springfield, OH 45502 | $5,482 |
52 | Kenneth Lokai | New Carlisle, OH 45344 | $5,280 |
53 | Larry R Wolbert | Mechanicsburg, OH 43044 | $5,250 |
54 | Mike Taylor | Springfield, OH 45502 | $5,179 |
55 | Robert A Agle | South Vienna, OH 45369 | $5,162 |
56 | Mark Cessna | Springfield, OH 45502 | $4,925 |
57 | Dona C Tullis | London, OH 43140 | $4,834 |
58 | James Timmons | Springfield, OH 45506 | $4,546 |
59 | Larry Timmons | Springfield, OH 45502 | $4,546 |
60 | Harbage Bros Farming Co LLC | South Charleston, OH 45368 | $4,400 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”