Conservation Reserve Program in Clark County, Ohio, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 147
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Clark County, Ohio totaled $169,000 in in 2020.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | David L Allen | Springfield, OH 45502 | $22,049 |
2 | Nancy Fisher | Springfield, OH 45502 | $14,038 |
3 | Larry R Wolbert | Mechanicsburg, OH 43044 | $6,653 |
4 | Bart F Neer | South Vienna, OH 45369 | $5,771 |
5 | Mike Taylor | Springfield, OH 45502 | $5,179 |
6 | Robert A Agle | South Vienna, OH 45369 | $5,049 |
7 | Baker Farm Trust | Cincinnati, OH 45236 | $3,517 |
8 | Gain And Grain Farm Inc | South Charleston, OH 45368 | $3,464 |
9 | Adam Agle & Sons LLC | South Vienna, OH 45369 | $3,338 |
10 | Thomas D Florence | South Charleston, OH 45368 | $3,335 |
11 | Gary Durst | Springfield, OH 45505 | $3,279 |
12 | Gillam Farm Inc | South Vienna, OH 45369 | $3,106 |
13 | Shank Farms LLC | Springfield, OH 45502 | $2,868 |
14 | Ronald Harbage | South Charleston, OH 45368 | $2,719 |
15 | Peggy J Wenrick | New Carlisle, OH 45344 | $2,480 |
16 | John T Baird & David J Baird Ptr Dba Jersey Manor | Springfield, OH 45502 | $2,352 |
17 | Shuman Farms Inc | Springfield, OH 45502 | $2,216 |
18 | Suzanne Fachon-kalweit | Springfield, OH 45502 | $2,186 |
19 | Constance A Bishop | New Carlisle, OH 45344 | $2,138 |
20 | B & C Miller Farm Inc | South Charleston, OH 45368 | $1,991 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>