Conservation Reserve Program in Fayette County, Ohio, 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 783

Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Fayette County, Ohio totaled $37,657,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Conservation Reserve Program
1995-2023
21James A PaisleyWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$282,330
22Ollie SponcilGreenfield, OH 45123$279,850
23Davis Family Farms Limited PartnershipWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$279,691
24Brian A ReevesWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$276,258
25Loretta MillerNew Holland, OH 43145$274,796
26Chris JeffriesWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$271,917
27James KigerGreenfield, OH 45123$271,122
28Bruce C ChilcoteWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$268,828
29Randy MillerNew Holland, OH 43145$268,654
30Kenneth W KirkNew Holland, OH 43145$259,851
31John N McfaddenGreenfield, OH 45123$259,764
32Don B MorrisLeesburg, OH 45135$243,830
33Shane K McmahonWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$243,743
34William H Fogle, TrusteeCincinnati, OH 45208$233,244
35Larry Lee GarringerJeffersonville, OH 43128$230,346
36Mark Drew AllenWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$220,925
37Wayne HidyBloomingburg, OH 43106$213,653
38Stergios BalahtsisNew Holland, OH 43145$206,437
39Timothy A BorrorWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$206,008
40John C PersingerWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$202,527

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag