Conservation Reserve Program in Fayette County, Ohio, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 353
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Fayette County, Ohio totaled $3,091,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Larry Maxel | Jeffersonville, OH 43128 | $10,600 |
82 | Virginia Mae Maxel Revocable Living Trust Usd 12/9 | Jeffersonville, OH 43128 | $10,600 |
83 | Timothy A Borror | Washington Court Hou, OH 43160 | $10,384 |
84 | John C Persinger | Washington Court Hou, OH 43160 | $10,066 |
85 | Straathof LLC | Washington Court Hou, OH 43160 | $9,950 |
86 | Darrell R Krupla | Washington Court Hou, OH 43160 | $9,944 |
87 | Jean Barger Rice Rev Trust | Washington Court Hou, OH 43160 | $9,822 |
88 | Michael Zint | Kissimmee, FL 34744 | $9,654 |
89 | Andrew - Dill Revoca J Dill | Washington Court Hou, OH 43160 | $9,612 |
90 | , | $9,519 | |
91 | Elizabeth Morrow | Richmond, KY 40475 | $9,502 |
92 | William H Caldwell | Mt Sterling, OH 43143 | $8,911 |
93 | Dale Hidy | Greenfield, OH 45123 | $8,808 |
94 | Joyce Creamer | Saint Paris, OH 43072 | $8,804 |
95 | Steve Simpson | Washington Court Hou, OH 43160 | $8,480 |
96 | John R Frost | Bloomingburg, OH 43106 | $8,474 |
97 | Reiterman Seed Farms LLC | Mount Sterling, OH 43143 | $8,192 |
98 | John Baumann | New Holland, OH 43145 | $8,167 |
99 | Michael Krol | Bloomingburg, OH 43106 | $8,125 |
100 | Barry Brown | Ashville, OH 43103 | $8,094 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”