Conservation Reserve Program in Fayette County, Ohio, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 341
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Fayette County, Ohio totaled $1,726,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
141 | Corey Hoppes | Washington Court Hou, OH 43160 | $2,739 |
142 | Michael E Smith | Washington Court Hou, OH 43160 | $2,664 |
143 | Charles Tom Worley | Hillsboro, OH 45133 | $2,614 |
144 | Todd Monroe | Washington Court Hou, OH 43160 | $2,600 |
145 | Barbara F Johnson | Washington Court Hou, OH 43160 | $2,538 |
146 | William J Taylor | Washington Court Hou, OH 43160 | $2,538 |
147 | Steven P Beathard | Greenfield, OH 45123 | $2,451 |
148 | Lavonne C Melvin | Bloomingburg, OH 43106 | $2,381 |
149 | Mark Drew Allen | Washington Court Hou, OH 43160 | $2,284 |
150 | James R Vanzant Jr | Greenfield, OH 45123 | $2,274 |
151 | David M Beatty | Angwin, CA 94508 | $2,272 |
152 | Justin J Armintrout | Washington Court Hou, OH 43160 | $2,240 |
153 | Daniel L Huff | Washington Court Hou, OH 43160 | $2,189 |
154 | James Philip Hains Trust, Mark A Hains Trustee | Bloomingburg, OH 43106 | $2,161 |
155 | Miriam B Engle | Washington Court Hou, OH 43160 | $2,159 |
156 | Anderson Farms | Washington Court Hou, OH 43160 | $2,144 |
157 | Bryan Cockerill | Washington Court Hou, OH 43160 | $1,995 |
158 | Kevin D Miller | Washington Court Hou, OH 43160 | $1,970 |
159 | Bryan C Mcclish | Washington Court Hou, OH 43160 | $1,954 |
160 | Sollars Property 3 LLC | Washington Court Hou, OH 43160 | $1,941 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”