Conservation Reserve Program in Fayette County, Ohio, 2021

Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 341

Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Fayette County, Ohio totaled $1,726,000 in in 2021.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Conservation Reserve Program
2021
141Corey HoppesWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$2,739
142Michael E SmithWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$2,664
143Charles Tom WorleyHillsboro, OH 45133$2,614
144Todd MonroeWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$2,600
145Barbara F JohnsonWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$2,538
146William J TaylorWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$2,538
147Steven P BeathardGreenfield, OH 45123$2,451
148Lavonne C MelvinBloomingburg, OH 43106$2,381
149Mark Drew AllenWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$2,284
150James R Vanzant JrGreenfield, OH 45123$2,274
151David M BeattyAngwin, CA 94508$2,272
152Justin J ArmintroutWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$2,240
153Daniel L HuffWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$2,189
154James Philip Hains Trust, Mark A Hains TrusteeBloomingburg, OH 43106$2,161
155Miriam B EngleWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$2,159
156Anderson FarmsWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$2,144
157Bryan CockerillWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$1,995
158Kevin D MillerWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$1,970
159Bryan C McclishWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$1,954
160Sollars Property 3 LLCWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$1,941

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag