Miscellaneous Conservation Programs in Fayette County, Ohio, 1995-2021

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 42

Recipients of Miscellaneous Conservation Programs from farms in Fayette County, Ohio totaled $120,000 in from 1995-2021.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Miscellaneous Conservation Programs
1995-2021
1Bluerock PropertiesGalena, OH 43021$14,000
2Edwin Clark MccoyWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$10,500
3Anthony PursellWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$10,500
4Davis Family Farms Limited PartnershipWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$10,500
5Easter R WoodsWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$7,434
6Loren CartwrightWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$6,555
7Tom Butts Farms IncAvon Lake, OH 44012$6,555
8Roma W Leland Gst Exempt TrustSaint Paul, MN 55106$5,642
9Beam EnterprisesWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$3,880
10Jerry ShawWshngtn Ct Hs, OH 43160$3,500
11Jane E MerrittGalloway, OH 43119$3,500
12Christopher T GarlandWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$3,500
13Betty CraigWshngtn Ct Hs, OH 43160$3,500
14Russell S Ebert JrNew Holland, OH 43145$3,263
15Dewine Enterprises IncJeffersonville, OH 43128$2,767
16Steve SimpsonWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$2,512
17Cook Farms PartnershipBloomingburg, OH 43106$2,483
18Glenn BennettWshngtn Ct Hs, OH 43160$2,273
19Harry E Wolfe JrNew Holland, OH 43145$1,836
20Jean TaylorWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$1,786

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag