Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 in Fayette County, Ohio, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 235
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 from farms in Fayette County, Ohio totaled $4,703,000 in in 2020.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Meerland Dairy LLC | South Solon, OH 43153 | $500,000 |
| 2 | Twin Oak Dairy LLC | South Solon, OH 43153 | $405,903 |
| 3 | Mount Sterling Dairy LLC | South Solon, OH 43153 | $322,174 |
| 4 | Miller Farms General Partnership | Washington Court Hou, OH 43160 | $278,347 |
| 5 | Holland Pyke LLC | Washington Ch, OH 43160 | $250,000 |
| 6 | Straathof Swine LLC | Washington Court Hou, OH 43160 | $250,000 |
| 7 | Bryant Agricultural Enterprise | Washington Court Hou, OH 43160 | $188,499 |
| 8 | Andrew Thomas Beatty | Greenfield, OH 45123 | $94,364 |
| 9 | John C Persinger | Washington Court Hou, OH 43160 | $63,998 |
| 10 | Richard Ralph Davidson | Washington Court Hou, OH 43160 | $62,274 |
| 11 | Davidson Farms Inc | Washington Court Hou, OH 43160 | $57,419 |
| 12 | Schaefer Family Farms LLC | Bloomingburg, OH 43106 | $50,501 |
| 13 | Dill Family Farms Inc | Sabina, OH 45169 | $50,446 |
| 14 | Scmc Partnership | Leesburg, OH 45135 | $48,894 |
| 15 | Gregory Gene Gustin | Washington Court Hou, OH 43160 | $46,965 |
| 16 | Todd Gustin | Washington Court Hou, OH 43160 | $46,965 |
| 17 | Thompson Creek Farms Inc | South Solon, OH 43153 | $43,049 |
| 18 | Kirk L Stuckey | Washington Court Hou, OH 43160 | $42,357 |
| 19 | Daniel R Robinson | Mount Sterling, OH 43143 | $41,962 |
| 20 | Bonham Farms LLC | Washington Court Hou, OH 43160 | $41,545 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf