Market Facilitation Program (MFP) in Fayette County, Ohio, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 364
Recipients of Market Facilitation Program (MFP) from farms in Fayette County, Ohio totaled $14,685,000 in in 2019.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Facilitation Program (MFP) 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bryant Agricultural Enterprise | Washington Court Hou, OH 43160 | $665,598 |
| 2 | Scmc Partnership | Leesburg, OH 45135 | $421,982 |
| 3 | Miller Farms General Partnership | Washington Court Hou, OH 43160 | $318,120 |
| 4 | Fred W Melvin | Bloomingburg, OH 43106 | $263,727 |
| 5 | Thompson Creek Farms Inc | South Solon, OH 43153 | $258,679 |
| 6 | Sollars Farms | Washington Court Hou, OH 43160 | $253,940 |
| 7 | Bonham Farms LLC | Washington Court Hou, OH 43160 | $240,551 |
| 8 | Gregory Gene Gustin | Washington Court Hou, OH 43160 | $240,106 |
| 9 | Todd Gustin | Washington Court Hou, OH 43160 | $240,106 |
| 10 | Fannin Ag. LLC | Washington Court Hou, OH 43160 | $222,300 |
| 11 | Ricketts Farm Inc | Jeffersonville, OH 43128 | $221,615 |
| 12 | Johnny T Pendleton | New Holland, OH 43145 | $205,502 |
| 13 | Montcrest Farms | Washington Court Hou, OH 43160 | $197,352 |
| 14 | Garth Hynes | Washington Court Hou, OH 43160 | $191,929 |
| 15 | David Dwight Duff | New Holland, OH 43145 | $172,121 |
| 16 | Whitney Grain And Cattle LLC | Bloomingburg, OH 43106 | $170,587 |
| 17 | John C Persinger | Washington Court Hou, OH 43160 | $164,191 |
| 18 | Schaefer Family Farms LLC | Bloomingburg, OH 43106 | $156,961 |
| 19 | Waddle Family Farms Operating LLC | Washington Court Hou, OH 43160 | $156,768 |
| 20 | Davidson Farms Inc | Washington Court Hou, OH 43160 | $154,616 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf