Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Licking County, Ohio, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 416
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Licking County, Ohio totaled $8,893,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Hendren Farms Partnership | Johnstown, OH 43031 | $715,978 |
2 | Trinity Swine LLC | Johnstown, OH 43031 | $500,000 |
3 | Timbuk Farms Inc | Granville, OH 43023 | $500,000 |
4 | Heimerl Farms Limited | Johnstown, OH 43031 | $481,205 |
5 | South Fork Dairy LLC | Thornville, OH 43076 | $250,000 |
6 | Shipley Farms | Newark, OH 43055 | $242,043 |
7 | Watts Farms Ltd | Alexandria, OH 43001 | $196,379 |
8 | Slater Bros Farm LLC | Hebron, OH 43025 | $185,219 |
9 | Lynd Fruit Farm Inc | Pataskala, OH 43062 | $166,554 |
10 | B Carr Farms Inc | Pataskala, OH 43062 | $156,761 |
11 | Parrish Farms Inc | Hebron, OH 43025 | $151,817 |
12 | Parrish Farms LLC | Hebron, OH 43025 | $136,312 |
13 | Patton Farms Ltd | Utica, OH 43080 | $132,669 |
14 | J K Keller Farms LLC | Hebron, OH 43025 | $122,752 |
15 | Michael Shipley | Utica, OH 43080 | $114,270 |
16 | Thomas E Dague II | Johnstown, OH 43031 | $109,466 |
17 | H W Martin & Son Co | Hebron, OH 43025 | $102,465 |
18 | Agri Business Finance ** | St Paris, OH 43072 | $98,785 |
19 | Fox Haven Ag LLC | Pataskala, OH 43062 | $95,725 |
20 | Kw Ltd | Pataskala, OH 43062 | $94,395 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>