Total Conservation Programs in Ottawa County, Ohio, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 334
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Ottawa County, Ohio totaled $805,000 in in 2020.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Todd Whipple | Oak Harbor, OH 43449 | $8,467 |
22 | Mcritchie Marsh LLC | Port Clinton, OH 43452 | $8,142 |
23 | Dennis Wagner | Port Clinton, OH 43452 | $7,369 |
24 | Brian Hild | Port Clinton, OH 43452 | $7,188 |
25 | Jane Fleming | Port Clinton, OH 43452 | $6,947 |
26 | Danny Biggert | Oak Harbor, OH 43449 | $6,941 |
27 | Gator Land Enterprises LLC | Toledo, OH 43623 | $6,868 |
28 | Joseph D Adams | Oak Harbor, OH 43449 | $6,846 |
29 | William Freimark | Graytown, OH 43432 | $6,552 |
30 | Robert A Witt | Oak Harbor, OH 43449 | $6,505 |
31 | Eugene F Snow | Oak Harbor, OH 43449 | $6,319 |
32 | Rodger Wagner | Port Clinton, OH 43452 | $6,310 |
33 | Cathy M Hall | Oak Harbor, OH 43449 | $6,224 |
34 | H Wm Wahlers Jr | Port Clinton, OH 43452 | $6,097 |
35 | Larry E Jacobs | Oak Harbor, OH 43449 | $6,047 |
36 | James Kohlman | Coldwater, MI 49036 | $6,018 |
37 | Lawrence St Clair | Oak Harbor, OH 43449 | $5,929 |
38 | William Wauford | Martin, OH 43445 | $5,926 |
39 | Larry Hefflinger Jr | Vandalia, OH 45377 | $5,801 |
40 | Steven Nietfeld | Oak Harbor, OH 43449 | $5,795 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”