Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Wyandot County, Ohio, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 510
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Wyandot County, Ohio totaled $10,444,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Ann E Suber | Carey, OH 43316 | $29,095 |
102 | David Suber | Carey, OH 43316 | $28,389 |
103 | Dale Riedlinger | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $27,883 |
104 | Madeline M Phillips - Living Trust | Carey, OH 43316 | $27,753 |
105 | Rodney E Phillips - Living Trust | Carey, OH 43316 | $27,753 |
106 | J-mar Holdings LLC | Carey, OH 43316 | $27,508 |
107 | Jatobed Farms | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $27,061 |
108 | James Needs | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $26,641 |
109 | Tvreber Ltd | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $26,164 |
110 | Matthew Charles Burks | Sycamore, OH 44882 | $25,838 |
111 | Dustin A Griffin | Sycamore, OH 44882 | $25,722 |
112 | Joseph Yost | Carey, OH 43316 | $25,550 |
113 | Jps Farms LLC | Forest, OH 45843 | $24,856 |
114 | Dan L Mcclain | Sycamore, OH 44882 | $24,091 |
115 | Aric E. Rothlisberger | Sycamore, OH 44882 | $24,091 |
116 | R A Sheaffer Inc | Morral, OH 43337 | $24,030 |
117 | Doty Farms LLC | Harpster, OH 43323 | $23,732 |
118 | Trevor Bowman Farms LLC. | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $23,732 |
119 | Eugene H Forney | Forest, OH 45843 | $23,722 |
120 | Kenneth J Derr | Wharton, OH 43359 | $23,714 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”