Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Wyandot County, Ohio, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 506
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Wyandot County, Ohio totaled $10,427,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ohio Family Farms | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $467,436 |
| 2 | 3 Flags Dairy LLC | Forest, OH 45843 | $300,821 |
| 3 | Williams Pork Inc | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $250,000 |
| 4 | Persistence Pork LLC | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $250,000 |
| 5 | Auglaize Pork, Inc. | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $250,000 |
| 6 | Rcj Sheaffer Partnership | Morral, OH 43337 | $226,797 |
| 7 | C H Mccarthy Corporation | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $214,280 |
| 8 | Noble Pork, Inc. | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $191,774 |
| 9 | Richards Farms | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $173,042 |
| 10 | Matthew L Smalley Farms LLC | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $166,659 |
| 11 | Gateway Pork LLC | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $140,890 |
| 12 | G & J Koehler Farms LLC | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $135,552 |
| 13 | James D Schilling | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $134,455 |
| 14 | Bils Family Farms Ltd | Nevada, OH 44849 | $132,877 |
| 15 | Herring Farms II, LLC | Harpster, OH 43323 | $121,125 |
| 16 | Grant Pork, Inc. | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $120,083 |
| 17 | R Pork LLC | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $106,697 |
| 18 | Sheaffer Farms Inc | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $99,898 |
| 19 | Salem Family Farms LLC | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $99,157 |
| 20 | Eden Stock Farm LLC | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $97,644 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf