Total Commodity Programs in Wyandot County, Ohio, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 493
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Wyandot County, Ohio totaled $12,359,000 in in 2019.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2019 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Franklin Fox | Forest, OH 45843 | $128,063 |
22 | Matthew L Smalley | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $126,998 |
23 | Noble Pork, Inc. | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $122,941 |
24 | Ronald L Walters | Forest, OH 45843 | $117,591 |
25 | Eden Stock Farm LLC | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $116,779 |
26 | Gary Walter | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $114,826 |
27 | Ag-credit Aca ** | Mount Gilead, OH 43338 | $112,858 |
28 | Gary Huffman | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $105,199 |
29 | Kw Farms Ltd | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $99,031 |
30 | Salem Family Farms LLC | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $96,116 |
31 | Jatobed Farms | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $95,703 |
32 | Herring Farms II, LLC | Harpster, OH 43323 | $91,282 |
33 | Richmond Farms Inc | Nevada, OH 44849 | $91,088 |
34 | David Wolfe Rev Trust | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $90,981 |
35 | Grant Pork, Inc. | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $89,461 |
36 | George F Rellinger | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $88,774 |
37 | Wyandot Pork LLC | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $87,500 |
38 | Leslie Farms LLC | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $80,847 |
39 | Hubert Sheaffer Inc | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $80,568 |
40 | Adam C Brodman | Carey, OH 43316 | $79,679 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”