Total Commodity Programs in Wyandot County, Ohio, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 623
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Wyandot County, Ohio totaled $16,999,000 in in 2020.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Ed Needs | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $141,654 |
22 | Reile And Co | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $132,425 |
23 | Salem Family Farms LLC | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $127,017 |
24 | Grant Pork, Inc. | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $126,029 |
25 | Kevin Summit Rev Trust | Carey, OH 43316 | $125,952 |
26 | Richmond Farms Inc | Nevada, OH 44849 | $121,624 |
27 | Todd M Summit | Carey, OH 43316 | $120,401 |
28 | Scott L Stansbery | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $118,360 |
29 | Leslie Farms LLC | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $116,610 |
30 | Larry Ross Farm Account | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $114,914 |
31 | Smalley Farms LLC | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $112,583 |
32 | Richard D Huston | Carey, OH 43316 | $107,395 |
33 | Eric G Benson | Nevada, OH 44849 | $106,864 |
34 | Rothlisberger Dairy Ltd | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $105,838 |
35 | William Warren Osborn | Sycamore, OH 44882 | $104,707 |
36 | Ralph F Culver | Harpster, OH 43323 | $98,088 |
37 | Gary Huffman | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $94,527 |
38 | Gary Walter | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $90,337 |
39 | Ag-credit Aca ** | Mount Gilead, OH 43338 | $90,066 |
40 | Bassler Family Farms LLC | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $88,501 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”