Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) in Cimarron County, Oklahoma, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 553
Recipients of Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) from farms in Cimarron County, Oklahoma totaled $5,851,000 in in 2020.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | High Plains Bank ** | Keyes, OK 73947 | $352,367 |
| 2 | First State Bank Of Boise City ** | Boise City, OK 73933 | $276,312 |
| 3 | L & J Land & Cattle LLC | Boise City, OK 73933 | $114,846 |
| 4 | Eieio Farms LLC | Boise City, OK 73933 | $111,461 |
| 5 | Jarrod Clinton Stewart | Keyes, OK 73947 | $102,330 |
| 6 | Farm Credit Of Western Oklahoma ** | Clinton, OK 73601 | $101,211 |
| 7 | Lori Dawn Stewart | Keyes, OK 73947 | $94,315 |
| 8 | Hickory Livestock Company LLC | Felt, OK 73937 | $90,506 |
| 9 | Harvest Days Inc | Keyes, OK 73947 | $80,846 |
| 10 | Linda K Minns | Goodwell, OK 73939 | $78,025 |
| 11 | James M Robinson | Boise City, OK 73933 | $74,838 |
| 12 | Tig Inc | Keyes, OK 73947 | $74,471 |
| 13 | Aimbank ** | Plains, TX 79355 | $73,009 |
| 14 | Stephen W Johnson | Boise City, OK 73933 | $72,845 |
| 15 | Thomas T James | Felt, OK 73937 | $72,516 |
| 16 | Arthaud Farms Inc | Keyes, OK 73947 | $69,271 |
| 17 | Wayne Montgomery | Boise City, OK 73933 | $67,964 |
| 18 | Agrifund LLC ** | Amarillo, TX 79106 | $67,241 |
| 19 | Nathan John Crabtree | Boise City, OK 73933 | $66,196 |
| 20 | Joel Eugene Imler | Boise City, OK 73933 | $65,051 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf