Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Custer County, Oklahoma, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 462
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Custer County, Oklahoma totaled $3,359,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Thad Sheldon Miller | Weatherford, OK 73096 | $85,246 |
2 | Mannering Farms LLC | Custer City, OK 73639 | $79,479 |
3 | Will Mannering | Thomas, OK 73669 | $64,017 |
4 | Roger Snider | Clinton, OK 73601 | $61,195 |
5 | Meacham Farms | Clinton, OK 73601 | $57,111 |
6 | Payne Farms And Cattle Co Inc | Thomas, OK 73669 | $56,025 |
7 | Covey & Covey Farms | Custer City, OK 73639 | $52,412 |
8 | Blue Chip Farms | Thomas, OK 73669 | $51,525 |
9 | Mark Mannering | Custer City, OK 73639 | $49,204 |
10 | Larry W Goyer | Weatherford, OK 73096 | $46,470 |
11 | Brandon Miller | Custer City, OK 73639 | $45,232 |
12 | Ricky Johnson | Butler, OK 73625 | $43,648 |
13 | Harold Miller | Custer City, OK 73639 | $41,685 |
14 | Donna Snider | Clinton, OK 73601 | $40,796 |
15 | A & C Taylor Farms LLC | Thomas, OK 73669 | $38,073 |
16 | M & J Farms LLC | Hydro, OK 73048 | $37,271 |
17 | Jeffrey Sauer | Weatherford, OK 73096 | $36,781 |
18 | Lee Farms Inc | Custer City, OK 73639 | $35,805 |
19 | James R Graft | Custer City, OK 73639 | $33,000 |
20 | Tina Mannering | Custer City, OK 73639 | $32,827 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>