Livestock Forage Disaster Program in Custer County, Oklahoma, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 295
Recipients of Livestock Forage Disaster Program from farms in Custer County, Oklahoma totaled $1,705,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Forage Disaster Program 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Farm Credit Of Western Oklahoma ** | Clinton, OK 73601 | $106,660 |
2 | Chase Redd | Elk City, OK 73648 | $59,290 |
3 | Leah Deal Redd | Elk City, OK 73648 | $49,476 |
4 | Meacham Farms | Clinton, OK 73601 | $43,834 |
5 | Ricky Johnson | Butler, OK 73625 | $41,273 |
6 | Wheeler Lowry | Clinton, OK 73601 | $40,252 |
7 | Don Rodolph | Clinton, OK 73601 | $37,786 |
8 | Leroy Moseley | Leedey, OK 73654 | $36,913 |
9 | Beutler-redd Ranches LLC | Elk City, OK 73644 | $36,430 |
10 | 3s Land & Cattle LLC | Butler, OK 73625 | $36,376 |
11 | Eagan Cattle Co | Butler, OK 73625 | $34,884 |
12 | Jan Harrison | Arapaho, OK 73620 | $34,438 |
13 | Allnations Bank ** | Calumet, OK 73014 | $30,700 |
14 | Payne Farms And Cattle Co Inc | Thomas, OK 73669 | $29,569 |
15 | Shane Eugene Mclaughlin | Butler, OK 73625 | $28,746 |
16 | Blue Chip Farms | Thomas, OK 73669 | $27,706 |
17 | Kevin Ramsey | Butler, OK 73625 | $25,939 |
18 | Lee Farms Inc | Custer City, OK 73639 | $25,672 |
19 | Mark Cobb | Butler, OK 73625 | $25,056 |
20 | Kenneth Hamar | Clinton, OK 73601 | $23,772 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>