Counter Cyclical Program in Grant County, Oklahoma, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 421
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Grant County, Oklahoma totaled $466,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Lanie Farms Gp | Manchester, OK 73758 | $140,567 |
| 2 | Feist Frank & Catherine Irr Tr | Topeka, KS 66611 | $43,030 |
| 3 | Larry Feist | Manchester, OK 73758 | $36,237 |
| 4 | Paul A Bollman | Anthony, KS 67003 | $23,038 |
| 5 | Kraus Farms LLC | Pond Creek, OK 73766 | $11,254 |
| 6 | Jack R. - And Deborah M. Crissup Revocable Living | Tulsa, OK 74170 | $11,025 |
| 7 | Ray Eugene Chadwick | Anthony, KS 67003 | $8,752 |
| 8 | Rempel Farms Inc | Medford, OK 73759 | $8,491 |
| 9 | James Andriano | Casa Grande, AZ 85193 | $8,066 |
| 10 | Danny J Feist | Hollister, CA 95023 | $7,708 |
| 11 | Marion Feist | Hollister, CA 95023 | $7,635 |
| 12 | Bessie Lanie Tr | Manchester, OK 73758 | $7,528 |
| 13 | Paul Lanie Tr - Terminated 2016 | Manchester, OK 73758 | $7,520 |
| 14 | Gary D Feist | Anthony, KS 67003 | $7,298 |
| 15 | Brian Feist | Ponca City, OK 74604 | $6,873 |
| 16 | Christina Feist | Ponca City, OK 74604 | $6,873 |
| 17 | Carl D Shaum | Manchester, OK 73758 | $5,989 |
| 18 | Blake Bollman | Anthony, KS 67003 | $5,978 |
| 19 | Larry Lanie | San Antonio, TX 78257 | $5,452 |
| 20 | Peggy Feist | Anthony, KS 67003 | $5,039 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf