Livestock Forage Disaster Program in Kay County, Oklahoma, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 640
Recipients of Livestock Forage Disaster Program from farms in Kay County, Oklahoma totaled $23,555,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Forage Disaster Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | John R Dobson | Kaw City, OK 74641 | $203,910 |
22 | James F Dobson II | Kaw City, OK 74641 | $203,664 |
23 | Terry Lane | Ponca City, OK 74601 | $199,999 |
24 | Robert R Boyer | Newkirk, OK 74647 | $191,677 |
25 | Peetoom Farms Jv | Nardin, OK 74646 | $191,098 |
26 | Tom Catlin | Ponca City, OK 74601 | $183,922 |
27 | Joe C Davis | Nardin, OK 74646 | $182,987 |
28 | Chad Mathew Otto | Ponca City, OK 74601 | $182,339 |
29 | Otto John Leven II | Newkirk, OK 74647 | $177,824 |
30 | Robert M Bergman Jr | Newkirk, OK 74647 | $165,706 |
31 | Charles Don Brandon | Newkirk, OK 74647 | $164,499 |
32 | Jeffrey Eugene Schieber | Newkirk, OK 74647 | $163,717 |
33 | Jeffrey Ballagh | Ponca City, OK 74604 | $158,714 |
34 | James D Davis | Tonkawa, OK 74653 | $150,829 |
35 | John Payne | Shidler, OK 74652 | $149,446 |
36 | Taylor D Hembree | Tonkawa, OK 74653 | $147,279 |
37 | Michael Ray Taylor | Blackwell, OK 74631 | $146,254 |
38 | Ruth H Steichen Dba Silvertop Farm | Ponca City, OK 74601 | $145,693 |
39 | Randall G Neighbors | Ponca City, OK 74601 | $145,455 |
40 | Gladys Lane | Red Rock, OK 74651 | $141,325 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”