Livestock Forage Disaster Program in Kay County, Oklahoma, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 640
Recipients of Livestock Forage Disaster Program from farms in Kay County, Oklahoma totaled $23,555,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Forage Disaster Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Jerry L Ramey | Newkirk, OK 74647 | $708,386 |
2 | John B Olsen | Newkirk, OK 74647 | $564,967 |
3 | Wooderson Farms | Blackwell, OK 74631 | $556,342 |
4 | Daniel Bowling Irrv Liv Tr | Blackwell, OK 74631 | $539,583 |
5 | Rick Lynn Worley | Newkirk, OK 74647 | $416,764 |
6 | Mark Kubik | Newkirk, OK 74647 | $368,268 |
7 | Jeff Kubik | Newkirk, OK 74647 | $367,858 |
8 | 7c Land And Cattle LLC | Red Rock, OK 74651 | $361,341 |
9 | Ronald M Aupperle | Newkirk, OK 74647 | $327,745 |
10 | Martin E Mccorgary Revocable Trust | Arkansas City, KS 67005 | $302,823 |
11 | Triple C LLC | Tonkawa, OK 74653 | $298,795 |
12 | R R Kahle Inc | Newkirk, OK 74647 | $290,401 |
13 | Micky Keeler | Ponca City, OK 74604 | $261,377 |
14 | Kubik Lynn E Rev Inter Vivos Tr | Newkirk, OK 74647 | $261,100 |
15 | J R Ramey | Newkirk, OK 74647 | $243,859 |
16 | H & H Farms | Newkirk, OK 74647 | $241,578 |
17 | Daniel Bowling Irrv Liv Tr | Newkirk, OK 74647 | $235,750 |
18 | W Kent Mcaninch | Tonkawa, OK 74653 | $219,366 |
19 | Jeffrey L Cline | Newkirk, OK 74647 | $218,722 |
20 | Toby Schieber | Newkirk, OK 74647 | $213,953 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>