Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Latimer County, Oklahoma, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 231
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Latimer County, Oklahoma totaled $1,721,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Michael Guazdausky | Hartshorne, OK 74547 | $206,828 |
2 | Jim And Linda Enis Farm, LLC | Wilburton, OK 74578 | $184,195 |
3 | Gerald Knapp | Talihina, OK 74571 | $85,198 |
4 | Jeffrey Cattle Company | Wilburton, OK 74578 | $81,620 |
5 | Watts Ranch LLC | Wilburton, OK 74578 | $50,050 |
6 | Cody Browne | Wilburton, OK 74578 | $49,841 |
7 | John Jeffrey | Wilburton, OK 74578 | $49,610 |
8 | Joe Mcalester | Wilburton, OK 74578 | $48,895 |
9 | Gerald Shero | Hartshorne, OK 74547 | $43,010 |
10 | Charles Wesley Fitzgerald | Talihina, OK 74571 | $34,399 |
11 | Troy L Walker II | Red Oak, OK 74563 | $31,499 |
12 | James H Booth Jr | Wilburton, OK 74578 | $30,690 |
13 | Tim Grogan | Red Oak, OK 74563 | $30,250 |
14 | Delbert Derryberry | Wilburton, OK 74578 | $28,490 |
15 | Seven Lakes Ranch | Talihina, OK 74571 | $23,375 |
16 | Latt Martin Jeffrey | Wilburton, OK 74578 | $23,339 |
17 | Bryce Hunter Livingston | Wilburton, OK 74578 | $17,380 |
18 | William Austin Shero | Wilburton, OK 74578 | $17,270 |
19 | Steve Davis | Hartshorne, OK 74547 | $13,365 |
20 | Fred F James Jr | Wilburton, OK 74578 | $12,460 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>