Total Commodity Programs in Washington County, Oklahoma, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 194
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Washington County, Oklahoma totaled $1,000,000 in in 2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Robert S Hughes II Hughes Cattle II LLC Exp. 2018 | Bartlesville, OK 74003 | $68,825 |
| 2 | Charles L Rolph | Dewey, OK 74029 | $61,669 |
| 3 | Kgg LLC | Bartlesville, OK 74006 | $58,956 |
| 4 | Ken Ada Ranches Inc | Bartlesville, OK 74005 | $47,420 |
| 5 | Barron Highsmith Cattle Company, LLC | Oologah, OK 74053 | $46,099 |
| 6 | Robert Fitzsimmons | Wann, OK 74083 | $37,595 |
| 7 | Cloverleaf Cattle Co LLC | Bartlesville, OK 74005 | $34,247 |
| 8 | Johnstone Bottoms Farm | Bartlesville, OK 74005 | $33,961 |
| 9 | Sumner Cattle Company LLC | Ramona, OK 74061 | $31,809 |
| 10 | Roecker Brothers LLC | Dewey, OK 74029 | $28,441 |
| 11 | Steve Snelson | Wann, OK 74083 | $26,611 |
| 12 | Clayton Dale Ullrich | Ramona, OK 74061 | $24,174 |
| 13 | Joe A Jeter Ag Inc | Copan, OK 74022 | $21,208 |
| 14 | Jacob Ryan Blum | Copan, OK 74022 | $18,717 |
| 15 | Gallery Ranch LLC | Bartlesville, OK 74006 | $16,496 |
| 16 | Kelly Zimmerman | Silver Spring, MD 20910 | $16,070 |
| 17 | Fitz Farms LLC | Wann, OK 74083 | $15,431 |
| 18 | Lester Gagan | Ramona, OK 74061 | $15,406 |
| 19 | Gerald R Rowe II | Ramona, OK 74061 | $13,825 |
| 20 | Kyle C Rowe | Ramona, OK 74061 | $13,409 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf