Farm Subsidy information
Baker County, Oregon
Total Subsidies in Baker County, Oregon, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,067
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Baker County, Oregon totaled $91,010,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Jacobs Ranch Inc. | Baker City, OR 97814 | $574,054 |
22 | Rex D Nelson | Baker City, OR 97814 | $569,417 |
23 | K - Diamond Inc | Haines, OR 97833 | $565,298 |
24 | Blatchford Brothers | Baker City, OR 97814 | $559,898 |
25 | Bnw Cattle Group, LLC | North Powder, OR 97867 | $552,415 |
26 | Elton Cook | Baker City, OR 97814 | $552,074 |
27 | Dlx LLC | Baker City, OR 97814 | $550,787 |
28 | Milburn Dailey Jr | Richland, OR 97870 | $529,820 |
29 | Moore Ranches, LLC | Hereford, OR 97837 | $517,412 |
30 | Rohner Farms Inc | Baker City, OR 97814 | $487,360 |
31 | Powder River Ranch | Baker City, OR 97814 | $480,327 |
32 | Double J Land & Cattle Co | Klamath Falls, OR 97601 | $480,086 |
33 | Aspen Partnership | Durkee, OR 97905 | $469,430 |
34 | Dan L. Forsea & Sons Inc | Richland, OR 97870 | $464,580 |
35 | Patrick J Arriola | Bridgeport, OR 97819 | $461,046 |
36 | Owen Family Revocable Trust | Durkee, OR 97905 | $460,580 |
37 | Farm At Eagle Tree, Inc | Haines, OR 97833 | $458,726 |
38 | William T Moore | Unity, OR 97884 | $444,204 |
39 | Virtue Financial Solutions, LLC | Baker City, OR 97814 | $441,956 |
40 | Jeffery P Wick | Meridian, ID 83642 | $425,897 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”