Total Commodity Programs in Baker County, Oregon, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 279
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Baker County, Oregon totaled $2,778,000 in in 2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bnw Cattle Group, LLC | North Powder, OR 97867 | $323,025 |
| 2 | Allen Farms Inc | North Powder, OR 97867 | $88,790 |
| 3 | Harrell Hereford Ranch Inc | Baker City, OR 97814 | $71,027 |
| 4 | Pickard Ranch LLC | Baker City, OR 97814 | $51,026 |
| 5 | Rohner Farms Inc | Baker City, OR 97814 | $50,461 |
| 6 | Moore Ranches, LLC | Hereford, OR 97837 | $46,163 |
| 7 | Arm Ward Ranches | Baker City, OR 97814 | $45,097 |
| 8 | Dlx LLC | Baker City, OR 97814 | $41,181 |
| 9 | Louis E Marks | North Powder, OR 97867 | $39,812 |
| 10 | Rainbow Bar Inc | Haines, OR 97833 | $39,798 |
| 11 | Bert R Siddoway | Durkee, OR 97905 | $39,735 |
| 12 | Glenora F Wright | Fruitland, ID 83619 | $39,404 |
| 13 | Kerns Rainbow Ranch Inc | Haines, OR 97833 | $38,732 |
| 14 | Farm At Eagle Tree, Inc | Haines, OR 97833 | $38,522 |
| 15 | Phillips Ranch Inc | Baker City, OR 97814 | $35,490 |
| 16 | Phillips Cattle Co | Baker City, OR 97814 | $34,646 |
| 17 | Blatchford Farms Inc | Haines, OR 97833 | $31,477 |
| 18 | R3 Farms Inc | Baker City, OR 97814 | $31,092 |
| 19 | Thomas Angus Ranch Inc | Baker City, OR 97814 | $31,076 |
| 20 | Hay Inc | North Powder, OR 97867 | $30,148 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf