Farm Subsidy information
Baker County, Oregon
Total Subsidies in Baker County, Oregon, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 338
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Baker County, Oregon totaled $7,289,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
141 | Matt Mcelligott | North Powder, OR 97867 | $7,882 |
142 | Kimberlee Anne Kerns | Baker City, OR 97814 | $7,805 |
143 | Double J Land & Cattle Co | Klamath Falls, OR 97601 | $7,728 |
144 | Seven Generations | Berkeley, CA 94703 | $7,662 |
145 | Timothy Delcurto | Belgrade, MT 59714 | $7,555 |
146 | Riley Boone Morgan | Baker City, OR 97814 | $7,509 |
147 | Rustin Smith | Baker City, OR 97814 | $7,418 |
148 | Derral J Thomas | Halfway, OR 97834 | $7,233 |
149 | Wade L Simpson | Baker City, OR 97814 | $7,029 |
150 | Lexi Shaw | Baker City, OR 97814 | $6,898 |
151 | Lance Adams | Richland, OR 97870 | $6,895 |
152 | Wendt Family LLC | Haines, OR 97833 | $6,883 |
153 | George Anderson | Richland, OR 97870 | $6,678 |
154 | Lowry Ranches | Baker City, OR 97814 | $6,675 |
155 | Clark - Stuart Family Trust Stuart | Springfield, OR 97478 | $6,618 |
156 | Robert Anthony Leggett | Haines, OR 97833 | $6,591 |
157 | Roger N Gulick | Halfway, OR 97834 | $6,589 |
158 | S & S Hay And Cattle, Inc | Baker City, OR 97814 | $6,522 |
159 | C & V Livestock Inc | Baker City, OR 97814 | $6,501 |
160 | Cheryl Martin | North Powder, OR 97867 | $6,394 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”