Conservation Reserve Program in Baker County, Oregon, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 125
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Baker County, Oregon totaled $12,112,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Lazy S Over 7 Inc | Durkee, OR 97905 | $937,875 |
2 | Bloomer Ranches Inc | Durkee, OR 97905 | $821,988 |
3 | Gary Bloomer | Baker City, OR 97814 | $814,510 |
4 | Timber Canyon Ranch LLC | Pendleton, OR 97801 | $703,689 |
5 | Elton Cook | Baker City, OR 97814 | $466,876 |
6 | Double J Land & Cattle Co | Klamath Falls, OR 97601 | $464,630 |
7 | Owen Family Revocable Trust | Durkee, OR 97905 | $426,403 |
8 | Virtue Financial Solutions, LLC | Baker City, OR 97814 | $341,956 |
9 | Powder River Ranch | Baker City, OR 97814 | $338,329 |
10 | Bert R Siddoway | Durkee, OR 97905 | $310,524 |
11 | Nelson C Bar C Ranch | Baker City, OR 97814 | $225,408 |
12 | Thomas B Norton | Baker City, OR 97814 | $218,577 |
13 | Michael R Miller | Baker City, OR 97814 | $208,146 |
14 | Thief Valley LLC | North Powder, OR 97867 | $206,147 |
15 | Michael J Widman | Baker City, OR 97814 | $199,111 |
16 | Aspen Partnership | Durkee, OR 97905 | $187,476 |
17 | Jeffery P Wick | Meridian, ID 83642 | $181,657 |
18 | Ted W Bloomer | Durkee, OR 97905 | $180,089 |
19 | Lawrence C Bates | Durkee, OR 97905 | $168,719 |
20 | Noble Lumber Inc | Beavercreek, OR 97004 | $167,993 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>