Total Conservation Programs in Grant County, Oregon, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 208
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Grant County, Oregon totaled $8,227,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
141 | Leonard Paul Osburn | Monument, OR 97864 | $3,200 |
142 | Quinque Viri L L C | Portland, OR 97201 | $3,150 |
143 | Richard Thompson | Mount Vernon, OR 97865 | $3,150 |
144 | Mat Carter | Seneca, OR 97873 | $3,115 |
145 | Patricia Kay Cotham | John Day, OR 97845 | $3,058 |
146 | Earl King | El Dorado Hills, CA 95762 | $3,004 |
147 | Mitch Mund | Monument, OR 97864 | $2,982 |
148 | Carter Trust C/o S. Livingston | Long Creek, OR 97856 | $2,835 |
149 | Peter Hettinga | Dayville, OR 97825 | $2,814 |
150 | Jerry Bernard | Prineville, OR 97754 | $2,814 |
151 | Kay Cotham | John Day, OR 97845 | $2,804 |
152 | Rodney G Potter | Bates, OR 97817 | $2,750 |
153 | Dan Herold | Long Creek, OR 97856 | $2,738 |
154 | Sue Porter | Kimberly, OR 97848 | $2,709 |
155 | Clayton Carr | Long Creek, OR 97856 | $2,630 |
156 | Ricco Ranch | Prairie City, OR 97869 | $2,621 |
157 | Mike Burgett | Mount Vernon, OR 97865 | $2,590 |
158 | Delton Bates | Prairie City, OR 97869 | $2,400 |
159 | Roy Densberger | Mount Vernon, OR 97865 | $2,320 |
160 | Galen Hayes | Canyon City, OR 97820 | $2,281 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”