Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Hood River County, Oregon, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 178
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Hood River County, Oregon totaled $9,657,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hood River Cherry Company | Hood River, OR 97031 | $500,000 |
| 2 | Dog River Ranch LLC | Mount Hood Parkdale, OR 97041 | $430,791 |
| 3 | Walter Wells & Sons LLC | Hood River, OR 97031 | $259,993 |
| 4 | Webster Orchards Inc | Hood River, OR 97031 | $250,000 |
| 5 | Riparian Maid Orchards LLC | Porterville, CA 93257 | $237,984 |
| 6 | Cpa Inds Inc | Hood River, OR 97031 | $223,427 |
| 7 | Mt. Hood Cherry Company, LLC | Hood River, OR 97031 | $204,013 |
| 8 | Mcnerney Farms Inc | Hood River, OR 97031 | $203,371 |
| 9 | Ron Rivers Orchards, Inc | Mount Hood Parkdale, OR 97041 | $180,075 |
| 10 | Lage Orchards Inc | Hood River, OR 97031 | $178,464 |
| 11 | Willis Family Inc | Hood River, OR 97031 | $171,264 |
| 12 | Thomsen Orchards Inc | Hood River, OR 97031 | $169,794 |
| 13 | Klindt Inc | Mount Hood Parkdale, OR 97041 | $164,504 |
| 14 | Mccarthy Orchard, LLC | Mt Hood Parkdale, OR 97041 | $157,841 |
| 15 | Kiyokawa Orchards Inc | Mount Hood Parkdale, OR 97041 | $155,858 |
| 16 | Equinox Tree & Vine LLC | Porterville, CA 93257 | $153,166 |
| 17 | Laurance Bros Inc | Mount Hood Parkdale, OR 97041 | $147,560 |
| 18 | Yasui Inc | Hood River, OR 97031 | $133,072 |
| 19 | Golden Mountain LLC | Hood River, OR 97031 | $119,508 |
| 20 | Oates Orchards Inc | Hood River, OR 97031 | $118,275 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf