Market Facilitation Program (MFP) in Hood River County, Oregon, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 95
Recipients of Market Facilitation Program (MFP) from farms in Hood River County, Oregon totaled $4,864,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Facilitation Program (MFP) 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Webster Orchards Inc | Hood River, OR 97031 | $375,000 |
| 2 | Bear Mountain Cherries, LLC | Hood River, OR 97031 | $358,685 |
| 3 | Golden Mountain LLC | Hood River, OR 97031 | $344,053 |
| 4 | Hood River Cherry Company | Hood River, OR 97031 | $282,941 |
| 5 | Fox Family Ranches LLC | Hood River, OR 97031 | $231,349 |
| 6 | Yasui Inc | Hood River, OR 97031 | $202,265 |
| 7 | Mcnerney Farms Inc | Hood River, OR 97031 | $193,120 |
| 8 | Sandahl Orchards Inc | Hood River, OR 97031 | $113,369 |
| 9 | George Aubert Orchards Inc | Mount Hood Parkdale, OR 97041 | $108,194 |
| 10 | Jr Farms | Vancouver, WA 98683 | $107,323 |
| 11 | Alpine View LLC | The Dalles, OR 97058 | $107,124 |
| 12 | Valley Crest Orchard Inc | Mount Hood Parkdale, OR 97041 | $107,104 |
| 13 | Upland Fruit Co. Inc. | Mount Hood Parkdale, OR 97041 | $105,867 |
| 14 | Mt. Hood Cherry Company, LLC | Hood River, OR 97031 | $92,511 |
| 15 | Nakamura Orchards Inc | Hood River, OR 97031 | $86,901 |
| 16 | Laurance Bros Inc | Mount Hood Parkdale, OR 97041 | $85,138 |
| 17 | Cpa Inds Inc | Hood River, OR 97031 | $84,355 |
| 18 | Gem Orchards | Mount Hood Parkdale, OR 97041 | $76,728 |
| 19 | Dick Kobayashi | Hood River, OR 97031 | $68,916 |
| 20 | Gerald L Sheirbon Ranches Inc | Hood River, OR 97031 | $58,263 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf