Market Loss Assistance Program in Klamath County, Oregon, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 324
Recipients of Market Loss Assistance Program from farms in Klamath County, Oregon totaled $2,918,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Loss Assistance Program 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Henzel Bros | Midland, OR 97634 | $273,291 |
| 2 | Ann & Ron Mcgill | Klamath Falls, OR 97601 | $207,314 |
| 3 | Jespersen-edgewood Inc | Klamath Falls, OR 97603 | $87,449 |
| 4 | Henzel Properties Ltd | Midland, OR 97634 | $82,259 |
| 5 | J & C Farming Company | Chiloquin, OR 97624 | $61,540 |
| 6 | Spencer Mcgill | Klamath Falls, OR 97601 | $53,910 |
| 7 | Jeffrey Hoyal | Medford, OR 97501 | $53,326 |
| 8 | Bonanza View Dairy Inc | Bonanza, OR 97623 | $51,812 |
| 9 | Horsley Farms Inc | Midland, OR 97634 | $51,236 |
| 10 | Scronce Farm Company | Merrill, OR 97633 | $50,669 |
| 11 | Lee R Sukraw | Klamath Falls, OR 97603 | $50,100 |
| 12 | Michael Edward Noonan | Klamath Falls, OR 97603 | $50,098 |
| 13 | Robert Flowers | Midland, OR 97634 | $45,934 |
| 14 | Lynn E Long | Klamath Falls, OR 97603 | $44,316 |
| 15 | Ritter Ranch | Bonanza, OR 97623 | $43,728 |
| 16 | Haskins & Co Inc | Bonanza, OR 97623 | $42,895 |
| 17 | Baley-trotman Farm | Malin, OR 97632 | $39,961 |
| 18 | Pete A Nevin | Dairy, OR 97625 | $34,966 |
| 19 | Ida Scala Trust | Klamath Falls, OR 97603 | $34,512 |
| 20 | Thys Dehoop | Klamath Falls, OR 97603 | $34,512 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf