Livestock Forage Disaster Program in Lane County, Oregon, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 49
Recipients of Livestock Forage Disaster Program from farms in Lane County, Oregon totaled $290,000 in in 2020.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Forage Disaster Program 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hawley Land & Cattle LLC | Cottage Grove, OR 97424 | $71,228 |
| 2 | Little Brim Land & Livestock Family Lp | Yoncalla, OR 97499 | $65,080 |
| 3 | Paul W Massey | Junction City, OR 97448 | $18,228 |
| 4 | Lane Potter Dba Lane Potter Livestock Services | Cottage Grove, OR 97424 | $11,788 |
| 5 | Tyler Potter Dba Tyler Potter Livestock Services | Cottage Grove, OR 97424 | $10,628 |
| 6 | Miller Penfold Cattle | Eugene, OR 97405 | $9,907 |
| 7 | Nicholas A Sumich | Blachly, OR 97412 | $9,279 |
| 8 | Scott T Potter Dba Potter Livestock Services | Cottage Grove, OR 97424 | $6,437 |
| 9 | High Prairie Land & Cattle Company LLC | Pleasant Hill, OR 97455 | $5,586 |
| 10 | Douglas W Mccarty | Eugene, OR 97405 | $5,324 |
| 11 | Douglas K Nulf | Junction City, OR 97448 | $4,810 |
| 12 | Deborah M Mattson | Eugene, OR 97405 | $4,463 |
| 13 | Double Oo Land & Cattle Co | Eugene, OR 97405 | $3,601 |
| 14 | Harvey E Calvin | Junction City, OR 97448 | $3,568 |
| 15 | Friends Farm LLC | Junction City, OR 97448 | $3,407 |
| 16 | Todd A Anderson | Pleasant Hill, OR 97455 | $3,251 |
| 17 | High Prairie Cattle Co LLC | Oakridge, OR 97463 | $3,116 |
| 18 | Joseph W Buster | Springfield, OR 97477 | $2,823 |
| 19 | Petersen Ranch LLC | Springfield, OR 97478 | $2,714 |
| 20 | Meyer Livestock Company, LLC | Creswell, OR 97426 | $2,648 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf