Environmental Quality Incentives Program in Union County, Oregon, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 23
Recipients of Environmental Quality Incentives Program from farms in Union County, Oregon totaled $331,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Environmental Quality Incentives Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Fred - Fred Wallender Rev Living Trust Wallender | La Grande, OR 97850 | $91,420 |
2 | Leonard L Gomes | Union, OR 97883 | $76,591 |
3 | S Hawkins Inc | La Grande, OR 97850 | $46,285 |
4 | F C Colton Ranches Inc | North Powder, OR 97867 | $35,222 |
5 | Steve Stanhope | Summerville Store, OR 97876 | $17,295 |
6 | The Estate Of Alta T Cunha | La Grande, OR 97850 | $13,153 |
7 | S Layne Lindley | La Grande, OR 97850 | $11,649 |
8 | Chris Heffernan | North Powder, OR 97867 | $9,135 |
9 | Duane Fleet | La Grande, OR 97850 | $6,008 |
10 | Boyd K Follett | Elgin, OR 97827 | $3,937 |
11 | John S Wilson Jr Trust | North Powder, OR 97867 | $3,500 |
12 | Ronnie Belsma | Pendleton, OR 97801 | $3,000 |
13 | William Mcclure | Elgin, OR 97827 | $2,691 |
14 | Martinus B Tromp Van Holst | Cove, OR 97824 | $2,569 |
15 | Cherry Hill Farms Inc | Summerville, OR 97876 | $2,000 |
16 | J.b. Wilson | North Powder, OR 97867 | $1,728 |
17 | Harlan N Scott | Elgin, OR 97827 | $1,674 |
18 | Max Lane | Cove, OR 97824 | $1,071 |
19 | John S Wilson Sr Rev Trust | North Powder, OR 97867 | $431 |
20 | Jack Mcgoldrick | Davis, CA 95616 | $400 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>