CCC Organic Programs in Pennsylvania, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 68
Recipients of CCC Organic Programs from farms in Pennsylvania totaled $45,110 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | CCC Organic Programs 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Pete Block | Sugar Grove, PA 16350 | $750 |
22 | Virginia Sheridan | Damascus, OR 97089 | $684 |
23 | , | $647 | |
24 | Nathan D Harkness | Gillett, PA 16925 | $625 |
25 | Stephen Wesley Henning | Mehoopany, PA 18629 | $613 |
26 | Oxbow Farm LLC | Port Royal, PA 17082 | $528 |
27 | Kirby M Reichert Jr | Grantville, PA 17028 | $500 |
28 | Peter N Fake | Windsor, PA 17366 | $500 |
29 | Trustees Of The University Of Pennsylvania | Kennett Square, PA 19348 | $500 |
30 | Richard L Smith | Pittsburgh, PA 15237 | $500 |
31 | David J Jackson | Danville, PA 17821 | $500 |
32 | Bella Vista Farm | Milroy, PA 17063 | $500 |
33 | Jeremy E Woodling | Beaver Springs, PA 17812 | $500 |
34 | Tim E Miller | Halifax, PA 17032 | $500 |
35 | Pedersen Produce LLC | Fredericksburg, PA 17026 | $500 |
36 | Zackery L Martin | Covington, PA 16917 | $500 |
37 | Anne Nordell | Trout Run, PA 17771 | $500 |
38 | Persimmon Hollow Organic Farms, L | Dornsife, PA 17823 | $500 |
39 | Brian And Barbra Shively | Millmont, PA 17845 | $500 |
40 | Reuben John Demaster | New Tripoli, PA 18066 | $500 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”