Biomass Crop Assistance Program in Pennsylvania, 1995-2021

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 56

Recipients of Biomass Crop Assistance Program from farms in Pennsylvania totaled $4,277,000 in from 1995-2021.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Biomass Crop Assistance Program
1995-2021
1Armstrong Hardwood Flooring CoLancaster, PA 17603$1,614,726
2Aloterra Farms LLCSpring, TX 77381$523,211
3Fort Jackson Logging LLCSpring Glen, PA 17978$429,000
4Henergy LLCCoudersport, PA 16915$358,259
5Frank Krammes Timber Harvesting ISacramento, PA 17968$143,000
6Walter R Lindemuth Lumber & SupplAshland, PA 17921$139,747
7Summit Forest Resources IncMarkleysburg, PA 15459$114,061
8D & R LoggingPine Grove, PA 17963$82,287
9K M Smith & Son Lumber & Land CleMc Veytown, PA 17051$64,709
10J & D AdamsHerndon, PA 17830$60,901
11R C Bloch Timber HarvetingHegins, PA 17938$57,200
12Bookwalter BrothersMapleton Depot, PA 17052$50,569
13Robert MyersMuncy Valley, PA 17758$42,851
14Metzler Forest Products LLCReedsville, PA 17084$41,498
15Richard RakerMillersburg, PA 17061$37,824
16Patrick M DakeArnot, PA 16911$35,752
17S & M Timber Products LLCMifflinburg, PA 17844$29,351
18Scott House Logging & Chipping LLCMansfield, PA 16933$28,600
19L & R Lumber IncMc Alisterville, PA 17049$27,487
20Keith Walter & Sons LoggingMiddleburg, PA 17842$27,267

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag