Miscellaneous Farm Programs in Erie County, Pennsylvania, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 244
Recipients of Miscellaneous Farm Programs from farms in Erie County, Pennsylvania totaled $199,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Miscellaneous Farm Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Burch Farms Inc | North East, PA 16428 | $37,784 |
2 | Gordon H Post | North East, PA 16428 | $24,361 |
3 | John Schultz & Sons | North East, PA 16428 | $20,448 |
4 | Lewis Orton | North East, PA 16428 | $16,506 |
5 | William M Byham | Lake City, PA 16423 | $15,381 |
6 | Lehman Fruit Farms | Girard, PA 16417 | $10,220 |
7 | William Michael Schultz | North East, PA 16428 | $10,139 |
8 | Boyce Fruit Farm | Girard, PA 16417 | $7,336 |
9 | Post Apple Scientific Inc | North East, PA 16428 | $6,831 |
10 | Larry Chace | North East, PA 16428 | $4,474 |
11 | Bruce Boyce | Girard, PA 16417 | $4,132 |
12 | Sceiford Farms | North East, PA 16428 | $4,012 |
13 | William Michael Schultz | North East, PA 16428 | $3,484 |
14 | Kmecik Farms | East Springfield, PA 16411 | $3,480 |
15 | Taylor Farms | Fairview, PA 16415 | $3,118 |
16 | Kamaha Inc | North East, PA 16428 | $3,044 |
17 | Neil James Baxter | Albion, PA 16401 | $2,897 |
18 | Gordon Maas | North East, PA 16428 | $2,624 |
19 | Nicholas C Mobilia | North East, PA 16428 | $1,947 |
20 | Bruce & Linda Getz | Lake City, PA 16423 | $1,785 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>