Market Loss Assistance Program in Erie County, Pennsylvania, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 439
Recipients of Market Loss Assistance Program from farms in Erie County, Pennsylvania totaled $3,110,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Loss Assistance Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Glenn Troyer Farms Inc | Waterford, PA 16441 | $90,191 |
2 | Fairview Evergreen Nurseries | Fairview, PA 16415 | $74,453 |
3 | Lyle & Ilene Bisbee | Union City, PA 16438 | $64,129 |
4 | Ward Brothers Dairy Farm Inc | Union City, PA 16438 | $55,501 |
5 | Bem & Bem | Union City, PA 16438 | $54,275 |
6 | Elmview Jersey Farm | Columbus, PA 16405 | $51,346 |
7 | Sand Ridge Farms | West Springfield, PA 16443 | $49,663 |
8 | Kruse Farms | Fairview, PA 16415 | $44,459 |
9 | Troyer Land Resources Inc | Waterford, PA 16441 | $43,357 |
10 | Woods Farm | Edinboro, PA 16412 | $41,856 |
11 | Harold Stephen Wiser | Fairview, PA 16415 | $40,652 |
12 | Shreve Farms C/o Bert Shreve | Union City, PA 16438 | $37,274 |
13 | Howard J Hammond III -concord Ridge Farm | Corry, PA 16407 | $37,125 |
14 | Robinson Brothers | Wattsburg, PA 16442 | $35,832 |
15 | Troyer Growers Inc | Waterford, PA 16441 | $34,631 |
16 | Leon F Wasielewski | Waterford, PA 16441 | $32,105 |
17 | Sedler Farms Inc | Girard, PA 16417 | $30,734 |
18 | Michael S Picardo | Erie, PA 16506 | $30,405 |
19 | Harold C Osborn Jr | Waterford, PA 16441 | $29,970 |
20 | Meabon Farms | Wattsburg, PA 16442 | $29,084 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>