Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program in Schuylkill County, Pennsylvania, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 156
Recipients of Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program from farms in Schuylkill County, Pennsylvania totaled $134,000 in in 2019.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Halabura Farms | Orwigsburg, PA 17961 | $10,026 |
| 2 | Haas Farms | Klingerstown, PA 17941 | $4,797 |
| 3 | Helen E Masser | Sacramento, PA 17968 | $4,728 |
| 4 | Hinkel Farms | Ashland, PA 17921 | $4,152 |
| 5 | Koch Farm Service Inc | Tamaqua, PA 18252 | $3,431 |
| 6 | Wehry Bros Hog & Grain Farms | Dornsife, PA 17823 | $3,344 |
| 7 | Kevin M Haas | Pitman, PA 17964 | $2,961 |
| 8 | Schwalm Farms Inc | Hegins, PA 17938 | $2,892 |
| 9 | Fidler Farms | Pottsville, PA 17901 | $2,772 |
| 10 | Eric Todd Wolfe | Pine Grove, PA 17963 | $2,737 |
| 11 | Wetzel Brothers | Valley View, PA 17983 | $2,713 |
| 12 | Edward Careyva | Ringtown, PA 17967 | $2,550 |
| 13 | Moyer Bros Farm | Andreas, PA 18211 | $2,346 |
| 14 | Ronald & Daniel Troxell | New Ringgold, PA 17960 | $2,216 |
| 15 | Charles J Fetterolf | Klingerstown, PA 17941 | $2,080 |
| 16 | Madeline Ruch | New Ringgold, PA 17960 | $2,027 |
| 17 | Lemoyne Eckroth | New Ringgold, PA 17960 | $1,928 |
| 18 | Gary Carl Anderson II | Schuylkill Haven, PA 17972 | $1,892 |
| 19 | Zimmerman Farms | Pitman, PA 17964 | $1,884 |
| 20 | James D Dunn | New Ringgold, PA 17960 | $1,837 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf