Farm Subsidy information
Washington County, Rhode Island
Total Subsidies in Washington County, Rhode Island, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 22
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Washington County, Rhode Island totaled $80,127 in in 2019.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2019 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Thomas Hoxsie | Narragansett, RI 02882 | $23,195 |
2 | Ian Campbell | Narragansett, RI 02882 | $21,337 |
3 | Francis Kenyon | Wyoming, RI 02898 | $6,627 |
4 | Trina Marsh | Ashaway, RI 02804 | $5,519 |
5 | Edwin Laprise | Exeter, RI 02822 | $3,810 |
6 | Farm Services Agency ** | Washington, DC 20250 | $3,788 |
7 | Matthew P Thibodeau | Charlestown, RI 02813 | $3,045 |
8 | Farming Turtles | Exeter, RI 02822 | $3,000 |
9 | David W Carpenter | Wakefield, RI 02879 | $1,765 |
10 | Benjamin Coerper | Exeter, RI 02822 | $1,143 |
11 | Brenda S Smith | Bradford, RI 02808 | $1,025 |
12 | Frank A Panciera | Westerly, RI 02891 | $913 |
13 | Jahmu Pbc | North Kingstown, RI 02852 | $750 |
14 | Palmer Farm | North Stonington, CT 06359 | $690 |
15 | Rhode Island Farm Incubator | Pawtucket, RI 02860 | $548 |
16 | Jeffrey Farrell | Narragansett, RI 02882 | $288 |
17 | Margaret R Kenyon | West Kingston, RI 02892 | $239 |
18 | Cottrell Homestead LLC | West Kingston, RI 02892 | $236 |
19 | Nicholas J Papa | Wakefield, RI 02879 | $206 |
20 | Riverside Farm, LLC | Charlestown, RI 02813 | $46 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>