Biomass Crop Assistance Program in South Carolina, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 107
Recipients of Biomass Crop Assistance Program from farms in South Carolina totaled $15,679,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Biomass Crop Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Simpson Lumber Company LLC | Georgetown, SC 29440 | $220,969 |
22 | Mid Carolina Timber Co Inc | Orangeburg, SC 29116 | $216,023 |
23 | Red Mountain Harvesting LLC | Pace, FL 32571 | $207,935 |
24 | Keels Land And Timber Company Inc | Timmonsville, SC 29161 | $207,924 |
25 | Hemingway Wood Forest Products In | Georgetown, SC 29442 | $206,123 |
26 | Tracy's Logging LLC | Leesville, SC 29070 | $202,693 |
27 | Hanna & Hanna Inc | Fairfax, SC 29827 | $185,278 |
28 | Topsaw Land And Timber Inc | Georgetown, SC 29440 | $183,129 |
29 | Kapstone Charleston Kraft LLC | North Charleston, SC 29423 | $182,735 |
30 | Meadwestvaco Corp | Summerville, SC 29483 | $172,715 |
31 | Carter Trucking Co LLC | Ninety Six, SC 29666 | $172,088 |
32 | Lcr Construction Inc | Port Royal, SC 29935 | $161,782 |
33 | Almond Forest Products Inc | Camden, SC 29020 | $157,631 |
34 | Hentz Forest Products Inc | Prosperity, SC 29127 | $142,710 |
35 | Twin State Forest Products Inc | Loris, SC 29569 | $132,882 |
36 | Wall Timber Company LLC | Fairfax, SC 29827 | $131,536 |
37 | Ingram Woodyards Inc | Biscoe, NC 27209 | $130,906 |
38 | Benton & Rhodes Logging Inc | Estill, SC 29918 | $127,768 |
39 | Carolina Land And Timber Inc | Moncks Corner, SC 29461 | $123,880 |
40 | Lake Swamp L&t LLC | Scranton, SC 29591 | $123,590 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”