Biomass Crop Assistance Program in South Carolina, 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 107

Recipients of Biomass Crop Assistance Program from farms in South Carolina totaled $15,679,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Biomass Crop Assistance Program
1995-2023
21Simpson Lumber Company LLCGeorgetown, SC 29440$220,969
22Mid Carolina Timber Co IncOrangeburg, SC 29116$216,023
23Red Mountain Harvesting LLCPace, FL 32571$207,935
24Keels Land And Timber Company IncTimmonsville, SC 29161$207,924
25Hemingway Wood Forest Products InGeorgetown, SC 29442$206,123
26Tracy's Logging LLCLeesville, SC 29070$202,693
27Hanna & Hanna IncFairfax, SC 29827$185,278
28Topsaw Land And Timber IncGeorgetown, SC 29440$183,129
29Kapstone Charleston Kraft LLCNorth Charleston, SC 29423$182,735
30Meadwestvaco CorpSummerville, SC 29483$172,715
31Carter Trucking Co LLCNinety Six, SC 29666$172,088
32Lcr Construction IncPort Royal, SC 29935$161,782
33Almond Forest Products IncCamden, SC 29020$157,631
34Hentz Forest Products IncProsperity, SC 29127$142,710
35Twin State Forest Products IncLoris, SC 29569$132,882
36Wall Timber Company LLCFairfax, SC 29827$131,536
37Ingram Woodyards IncBiscoe, NC 27209$130,906
38Benton & Rhodes Logging IncEstill, SC 29918$127,768
39Carolina Land And Timber IncMoncks Corner, SC 29461$123,880
40Lake Swamp L&t LLCScranton, SC 29591$123,590

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag