Biomass Crop Assistance Program in South Carolina, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 107
Recipients of Biomass Crop Assistance Program from farms in South Carolina totaled $15,679,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Biomass Crop Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Canal Wood LLC | Conway, SC 29528 | $1,568,640 |
2 | White Wood Inc | Walterboro, SC 29488 | $957,466 |
3 | Collum Sawmill LLC | Allendale, SC 29810 | $953,883 |
4 | W K Brown Timber Corporation | Hodges, SC 29653 | $796,742 |
5 | Palmetto Pulpwood & Timber | Florence, SC 29506 | $653,774 |
6 | Claybourn Walters Logging Co Inc | Proctorville, NC 28375 | $535,507 |
7 | Coastline Forest Products Inc | Harleyville, SC 29448 | $525,414 |
8 | Tidewater Land & Timber Inc Of Sc | Ruffin, SC 29475 | $443,084 |
9 | Kingstree Forest Products Inc | Kingstree, SC 29556 | $391,847 |
10 | Elliott Saw Milling Co Inc | Estill, SC 29918 | $370,960 |
11 | Log Creek Timber Co | Edgefield, SC 29824 | $351,033 |
12 | Low Country Forest Products Inc | Georgetown, SC 29440 | $349,933 |
13 | Dempsey Wood Products | Rowesville, SC 29133 | $286,514 |
14 | Charles K Doolittle Inc | Newberry, SC 29108 | $281,064 |
15 | H & H Construction & Storm Services, Inc. | Florence, SC 29505 | $262,642 |
16 | E D Pew Timber Co Inc | Darlington, SC 29540 | $258,204 |
17 | Swamp Fox Timber Co Inc | Marion, SC 29571 | $232,358 |
18 | Johnson Co Inc | Sumter, SC 29151 | $232,073 |
19 | Charles Ingram Lumber Co | Effingham, SC 29541 | $230,473 |
20 | Foothills Forest Products Inc | Whitmire, SC 29178 | $223,460 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>