Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in South Carolina, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 892
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in South Carolina totaled $1,683,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | , | $16,761 | |
22 | Richard & Jane Rogers Farm | Bennettsville, SC 29512 | $16,604 |
23 | Arbor One Aca ** | Florence, SC 29502 | $16,181 |
24 | Cottle Holdings Inc | Florence, SC 29501 | $16,027 |
25 | Patrick E Burch | Lake City, SC 29560 | $15,696 |
26 | Gregg Covington Farms Partnership | Norway, SC 29113 | $15,671 |
27 | T & M Farms | Ulmer, SC 29849 | $15,276 |
28 | Robert E Crosby | Estill, SC 29918 | $14,675 |
29 | J Allan Mcdonald Farms | Tatum, SC 29594 | $14,595 |
30 | Modern Turf Inc | Rembert, SC 29128 | $14,137 |
31 | Baxley & Baxley Farms | Dillon, SC 29536 | $13,784 |
32 | Jerry Lee Mcelveen Jr | New Zion, SC 29111 | $13,064 |
33 | R Mcniel Hinson | Hamer, SC 29547 | $12,601 |
34 | M3 Farms | Kingstree, SC 29556 | $11,758 |
35 | Jeffery A Sweatman | Saint George, SC 29477 | $11,532 |
36 | Jordan Farms | Bishopville, SC 29010 | $11,414 |
37 | Triple C Farms Inc | Chesnee, SC 29323 | $11,222 |
38 | Moore Family Farms LLC | Manning, SC 29102 | $10,522 |
39 | Pendarvis Farms LLC | Harleyville, SC 29448 | $10,247 |
40 | Agriservices Inc Of The Pee Dee | Hartsville, SC 29550 | $10,213 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”